SA’s hospitality leaders are doing something about it
South Africa’s hospitality sector is facing a deepening frontline staff crisis, one that operators say has been building since 2019 and can no longer be deferred. At its heart is a challenge as simple as it is difficult to solve: many of today’s hotel workers have never been a guest in the type of property where they work.
The intuitive service knowledge that previous generations brought to the job through lived experience – knowing what good feels like, what attentive looks like, what a properly set table communicates – can no longer be assumed. It has to be taught, from scratch, often in formats that standard training content does not reach.
It was one of several hard truths that senior operators from Accor, Radisson, Capital Hotels, Southern Sun, City Lodge, Minor Hotels, and the Saxon put on the table together at the inaugural Frontline Workforce Roundtable Series, held at the Saxon Hotel, Villas & Spa in Johannesburg on 13 May. The session was convened by hospitality learning and development company FUEL in partnership with FEDHASA Inland and addressed a conversation the industry had been avoiding for years.
“This is a forum that has been lacking from a FEDHASA perspective for years,” said Gustav Pieterse, General Manager of the Saxon Hotel and FEDHASA Inland Chairperson, who attended the session. “It is critical, not just for the federation, but for the industry as a whole.”
The workforce challenge
The roundtable identified several compounding pressures that operators say have been building since 2019.
The changed labour pool was among the most critical issues addressed. Beyond the experience gap, operators flagged that a matric certificate can no longer be assumed to indicate functional literacy, meaning standard training content is frequently pitched above the level the learner can absorb. The training happens. The knowledge does not land. Standards drift as a result.
Training and L&D budgets have absorbed a disproportionate share of industry cost cuts across the same period. The middle management layer lost during Covid-19 has not recovered, leaving remaining managers to carry functions that once belonged to multiple colleagues, significantly reducing the number of internal voices making the case for staff investment.
“The bar for ‘good enough’ has been moving,” Pieterse said. “Not because anyone decided that was acceptable, but because the day-to-day pressure to keep operations running made it easy to defer the harder work of developing people properly. The room was clear: that trajectory is not sustainable.”
What operators say is working
Operators shared solutions they reported as producing measurable results in their own properties.
Hiring through existing employee networks has proven one of the most reliable retention tools. When a staff member refers a candidate, they carry personal accountability for that person’s success, an effect one participant described as “a bit of indirect blackmail, but it works.”
Structured multi-year progression pathways – from Youth Employment Service (YES) placements through internship to permanent employment, with each stage visible to the staff member upfront – give people a reason to stay. Those who can see where they are going are far less likely to leave for a marginal pay increase elsewhere.
Cross-skilling across departments, widely adopted as a Covid necessity, has become a talent identification tool. Several operators described staff whose potential only became visible once they moved across the property. In one case, a learner who independently completed optional engineering content in her own time surfaced a career direction her manager had never identified.
The room also challenged generic onboarding, with operators increasingly building differentiated induction journeys for different entrant types rather than running all new hires through the same programme.
Perhaps the most counterintuitive finding: operators who invest in staff development and lose those staff to other properties reported better outcomes than those who withheld development. Alumni become ambassadors and many return. “Either way, the investment stays in the industry,” Pieterse said.
Culture as the strongest retention lever
Across every practice the roundtable discussed, a single thread emerged. The properties with the lowest turnover and strongest service were not necessarily those with the best programmes or the highest training budgets. They were the ones where staff genuinely believed someone in the building cared about them.
“If people believe you care about the things they are battling with at home, they are far more likely to care about the things you ask them to care about at work,” one participant said.
Culture of belonging – the felt sense that a person’s future is possible in this place – was named by multiple operators as the single most reliable retention lever available. Not a policy. Not a perk. A daily practice of genuine care.
“That is also the reason for optimism,” Pieterse said. “The most powerful tool available to this industry is not something that has to be bought or outsourced. It is something hospitality has always known how to provide.”
Download the discussion report HERE.
